Petition to revoke article 50

Tutorial: clarification of certificate of digital stamp without effects

PREVIOUS LEGISLATION [Show]Article 19.Disrespectful, obscure or repetitive requests. Every request must be respectful. Only when his purpose or object is not understood, it will be returned to the interested one in order that it corrects it or clarifies it inside the ten (10) following days. If it is not corrected or clarified, the petition shall be filed.      With regard to reiterative requests already solved, the authority will be able to refer to the previous answers.      JURISPRUDENCE [Show]Effective from: 01/11/2011 and until: 29/06/2015
Article 19.Disrespectful, obscure or reiterative petitions. Every petition must be respectful. Only when its purpose or object is not understood, it shall be returned to the interested party for correction or clarification within ten (10) days. If it is not corrected or clarified, the petition shall be filed.      With respect to repetitive petitions already resolved, the authority may refer to the previous answers.      Effective from: 01/18/2011 to: 10/31/2011
Article 20. Priority attention to petitions. The authorities shall give priority attention to petitions for the recognition of a fundamental right when they must be resolved to avoid irremediable damage to the petitioner, who must summarily prove the ownership of the right and the risk of the damage invoked.        When, for reasons of health or personal safety, the life or integrity of the addressee of the requested measure is in imminent danger, the authority shall immediately adopt the necessary emergency measures to avert such danger, without prejudice to the processing of the petition. If the request is made by a journalist, for the exercise of his activity, it will be processed preferentially.        .      TEXT CORRESPONDING TO [Show] [Show].

Revocation of security measure – step by step.

«We’ve removed the feature to view the most frequent petitions from the front page to prioritize people trying to sign petitions,» reported this Commission’s account. «Our job is to help people start and sign petitions about the things that matter to them, so we’re working hard to make sure that can happen.»
The rate of signing is the highest the site has ever had to deal with and we have had to make some changes to ensure the site remains stable and open for signatures and new petitions. Thanks for bearing with us.- Petitions Committee (@HoCpetitions) March 21, 2019

How can i claim my inheritance?

These «ad extra» actions of the Administrations are expressly mentioned in Article 105 of the Constitution, which establishes that the Law shall regulate the hearing of citizens, directly or through the organizations and associations recognized by the Law, in the procedure for the preparation of the administrative provisions that affect them, as well as the procedure through which administrative acts must be produced, guaranteeing, when appropriate, the hearing of the interested parties.
In accordance with the constitutional framework described above, this Law regulates the minimum rights and guarantees that correspond to all citizens with respect to administrative activity, both in terms of the exercise of the power of self-regulation and of the regulatory power and legislative initiative.
There are several relevant legislative precedents in this matter. The legislator has made the concept of administrative procedure evolve, adapting the form of action of the Administrations to the historical context and the social reality of each moment. Apart from the well-known Azcárate Law of October 19, 1889, the first complete regulation of the administrative procedure in our legal system is contained in the Administrative Procedure Law of July 17, 1958.

How to prepare a request for leave to consult the court

(1) The Tribunal shall have the power to decide on its own jurisdiction. For the purposes of this Article, an arbitration clause arbitrated under the Additional Facility shall be severable from the other terms of the contract in which it may have been included.
(4) After a plea relating to the dispute has been formally raised, the Tribunal may stay the proceedings on the merits of the case. The Chairman of the Tribunal, after consulting the other members, shall fix a time limit within which the parties may present their views on the objection.
(5) The Tribunal shall decide whether the further proceedings relating to the objection raised under paragraph (2) shall be oral. It may decide the objection as a preliminary question or together with the issues on the merits. If the Tribunal rejects the objection or decides to consider it with the merits, it shall again fix time limits for further proceedings.
(6) Unless the parties have agreed on another expeditious procedure for raising preliminary objections, a party may, not later than 30 days after the constitution of the Tribunal, and in any event before the first session of the Tribunal, raise an objection relating to the manifest lack of legal merit of a claim. The party shall specify, as precisely as possible, the basis of its objection. The Tribunal, after giving the parties an opportunity to present their observations on the objection, shall, at its first session or promptly thereafter, notify the parties of its decision on the objection. The decision of the Tribunal shall be without prejudice to the right of a party to raise a plea under paragraph (2) or to raise, in the course of the proceeding, defenses that a claim is without legal merit.